Sex offender registration and notification policies have been subject of much debate. Findings are discussed in relation to prior work on SORN as well as policy implications and considerations. In regard to notifying students, African American respondents were more likely to think notifying students was important. Using logistic regression, influencing factors that increased the odds respondents would find notification important for faculty/staff and students included their level of concern about registered persons attending college, number of children, and perceptions of social problems being worse now compared to 10 years ago. adults in relation to campus notification. Via an online survey, this research assessed public perceptions of 1,269 U.S. No research has assessed public perceptions of extending SORN, and in particular the perceived importance of notifying faculty, staff, and/or students about an enrolled student on campus that is registered. Based on legislation, one potential pathway is the extension of sex offender registration and notification (SORN) to the campus community. Institutes of higher education have been called to action to address and prevent sexual violence perpetrated against college students. Results are discussed in relation to residence restrictions as a CCT law, including the deleterious effects of residence restrictions and possible pathways to prevent the persistence of this law. Results indicate that if community members are Catholic, are a parent of a minor child, and believe in stranger danger, they are more likely to believe that residence restrictions are effective in reducing sex crime recidivism. Drawing on data from a national random sample of Americans, logistic regression is used to analyze the factors associated with this CCT law. Specifically, it evaluates what community member beliefs and or characteristics increase the likelihood that residence restrictions will be perceived as an effective law to decrease sex crime recidivism. This study draws on the concept of CCT to better understand public perceptions of sex offender residence restrictions. Such laws, labeled “crime control theater” (CCT), derive their unquestioned public support from moral panics involving mythic narratives, yet little research has actually linked these criteria to support for a theater law. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the lower court to carry this judgment into execution.Ī certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.Some crime control policies are ineffective, yet still draw substantial public support. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that appellant recover of appellee costs herein taxed. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Gallagher, J., Sweeney, P.J., and Keough, J.įred Andrew Farley, Jr., pro se EILEEN A. GALLAGHER EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGAĬivil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case Nos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |